- WHICH IS BEST FOR PHOTO EDITING PC OR MAC PRO
- WHICH IS BEST FOR PHOTO EDITING PC OR MAC SOFTWARE
- WHICH IS BEST FOR PHOTO EDITING PC OR MAC PROFESSIONAL
- WHICH IS BEST FOR PHOTO EDITING PC OR MAC MAC
- WHICH IS BEST FOR PHOTO EDITING PC OR MAC WINDOWS
Unfortunately, due to the coronavirus, the timeline on a custom build was taking two weeks or more as people geared up for working at home. I never planned to build the machine myself. I won’t bore you with my evaluation process of Apple gear suffice to say that when they started producing $7,000 displays with $1,000 stands, it became clear that Apple was no longer making computers for photographers like me. The Apple tax rose, and the decisions seemed to be pushing consumers down a path where the wastage was insurmountable and the price premium wasn’t justifiable. The problem is that it didn’t stop with that. It didn’t bother me too much when Apple went Unibody and updates became confined to RAM and hard drives.
WHICH IS BEST FOR PHOTO EDITING PC OR MAC MAC
The last time I built something, fans were tiny, and hard drives spun.įor the last 15 or so years, I’ve been a Mac user for photo editing, and for the most part, I’ve been happy. But if you specifically want the smaller form factor for portability, it looks like there’s no reason not to press the button now.I hadn’t built a PC for about 15 years before venturing into this. In addition to the larger screen, that should be significantly more powerful than the 13-inch model.
Personally, however, I’d advise photographers and videographers in the market for a MacBook to hold out for the Apple Silicon 16-inch MacBook Pro, expected later this year.
WHICH IS BEST FOR PHOTO EDITING PC OR MAC SOFTWARE
At the very least you’ll still be able to use all your current software as normal via Rosetta 2, and in time when official M1 versions are released, those performance boosts – and likely the battery life savings as well – will be extremely welcome. If you’re a photographer and considering upgrading, I’d absolutely say the M1 MacBook is a safe bet. I’m certainly excited about what performance improvements we’ll see as more developers fully optimize their software for Apple’s silicon.
WHICH IS BEST FOR PHOTO EDITING PC OR MAC PRO
Even when running non-optimized versions of apps, the M1 MacBook Pro still puts up a hell of a fight against a superpowered editing PC, and the fact that it’s able to outperform the PC on some tests when using M1-optimized beta apps is astonishing. While Hoyle didn’t give any comparisons, he said that there were ‘”no issues” working with 4K files in DaVinci Resolve Studio, a high-end video editing and color-correction app.Īll in, he says, there’s no reason for photographers to hold back. For reference, my desktop did the same export in 1:20. The Intel-based version of Premiere took 6 minutes, 25 seconds to export on the M1 MacBook, but the optimized M1 beta version took about half the time, at 3 minutes, 24 seconds. The PC was still significantly faster when it came to video, however. The M1 version of Lightroom also beat out the PC when it came to importing 100 raw images. It took 22 seconds to align the layers and 46.6 seconds to merge them - a faster overall time than my immensely powerful editing rig was able to achieve. However I then ran the same tests on the beta version of Photoshop that supports Apple M1. The PC took 20 seconds to align the layers and 53 seconds to merge them - a clear victory for the PC.
WHICH IS BEST FOR PHOTO EDITING PC OR MAC WINDOWS
I compared that to an exceptionally powerful Windows desktop PC that was built with an AMD RyX CPU, Nvidia RTX Titan graphics and 128GB RAM, specifically to be a beast with editing photos and 8K video. Intel-based Photoshop, via Rosetta 2, took 50.3 seconds to align the layers and 1 minute, 37 seconds to merge them. It’s a technique I use regularly in my product photography, so it’s important for me to have good efficiency here. I tested how long it took Photoshop (both in Intel and M1 beta versions) to align 19 full-resolution raw images and then to merge them into a focus-stacked image. He found that the M1 MacBook Pro with 16 GB RAM didn’t compete when it was running Intel-based Photoshop, but it was a different story when he tried the M1 beta version. Hoyle is CNET’ s European lead photographer.
WHICH IS BEST FOR PHOTO EDITING PC OR MAC PROFESSIONAL
Professional photographer Andrew Hoyle said that he was “astonished” by the performance, and concludes that an M1 Mac is a safe bet for photographers looking to upgrade… An M1 MacBook Pro photo editing test found that the 13-inch M1 MacBook Pro running M1-optimized apps was faster than a ‘”beast” of a Windows desktop PC – despite the fact that the latter was specifically specced with photo editing in mind and had a massive 128 GB of RAM.
0 kommentar(er)
